Key result
Cardiac contractility modulation is a promising therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but its implementation in guidelines is delayed due to a lack of large randomized trials.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This editorial discusses the stringent evidence requirements in cardiology that delay guideline implementation of innovations like cardiac contractility modulation.
This article refers to 'Cardiac contractility modulation improves long-term survival and hospitalizations in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction' by S.D. Anker et al., published in this issue on pages 1103-1113.In Cardiology, with evidence-based medicine, a new therapy has a long and difficult journey before being recommended with a high class of recommendation by the scientific societies.Usually strong evidence from large clinical randomized using mortality and morbidity endpoints are needed.This is not the case in other medical specialties where new therapies, usually very expensive, with a limited benefit in terms of decreased mortality are widely used with a high cost for the society.Are we right in Cardiology?Do not we slow down too much innovations?Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is an electrical treatment which may be proposed to patients with severe heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), QRS < 130 ms and optimal medical treatment.This technique is not really new, starting almost 20 years ago.By contrast to cardiac resynchronization therapy which started in 1994 and was implemented in the guidelines for heart failure in 2005 with a class I recommendation, CCM is not yet implemented in the guidelines even if this technique got the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and the CE mark.1,2 CCM is just suggested for consideration by the European Society of Cardiology guidelines in patients with symptomatic heart failure on optimal medical treatment and with normal or mildly prolonged QRS duration and reduced LVEF.The main reason is probably the lack of data and evidence from large randomized trials with hard endpoints such as mortality and morbidity.The concept of CCM is attractive and induces biological and molecular changes: CCM is applied usually 5 to 7 h/day at relatively high voltage (7.5 V), long duration (20 ms), and biphasic electric signals to the right ventricular septal wall during the absolute myocardial refractory period.CCM signals do not induce ventricular contraction but influence the biology of the failingThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of the European Journal of Heart Failure or of the European Society of Cardiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leclercq et al. (2019) conducted an editorial in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) was evaluated. Cardiac contractility modulation is a promising therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but its implementation in guidelines is delayed due to a lack of large randomized trials.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: