Key result
Noninvasive telemetry shows maximal biventricular refractory period dispersion averages ~40 ms during induced VF.
Why the study?
Local ventricular refractoriness and its dispersion during ventricular fibrillation have not been well evaluated due to methodological difficulties.
Can a non-invasive method using oesophageal electrodes and ICD telemetry evaluate ventricular refractoriness and its dispersion during induced VF in patients with ICDs?
Observational (n=11)
No
Can a non-invasive method using oesophageal electrodes and ICD telemetry evaluate ventricular refractoriness and its dispersion during induced VF in patients with ICDs?
Simultaneous recording of local ventricular activities via oesophageal electrode and ICD telemetry is a feasible non-invasive technique for evaluating the dispersion of refractoriness during VF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for ventricular ERP dispersion in VF; larger studies needed to evaluate arrhythmic implications.
BACKGROUND: Local ventricular refractoriness and its dispersion during ventricular fibrillation (VF) have not been well evaluated, due to methodological difficulties. METHODS: In this study, a non-invasive method was used in evaluation of local ventricular refractoriness and its dispersion during induced VF in 11 patients with VF and/or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) who have implanted an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Bipolar electrograms were simultaneously recorded from the lower oesophagus behind the posterior left ventricle (LV) via an oesophageal electrode and from the right ventricular (RV) apex via telemetry from the implanted ICD. VF intervals were used as an estimate of the ventricular effective refractory period (VERP). In 6 patients, VERP was also measured during sinus rhythm at the RV apex and outflow tract (RVOT) using conventional extra stimulus technique. RESULTS: Electrograms recorded from the RV apex and the lower esophagus behind the posterior LV manifested distinct differences of the local ventricular activities. The estimated VERPs during induced VF in the RV apex were significantly shorter than that measured during sinus rhythm using extra stimulus technique. The maximal dispersion of the estimated VERPs during induced VF between the RV apex and posterior LV was that of 10 percentile VF interval (40 +/- 27 ms), that is markedly greater than the previously reported dispersion of ventricular repolarization without malignant ventricular arrhythmias (30-36 ms). CONCLUSIONS: This study verified the feasibility of recording local ventricular activities via oesophageal electrode and via telemetry from an implanted ICD and the usefulness of VF intervals obtained using this non-invasive technique in evaluation of the dispersion of refractoriness in patients with ICD implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Ventricular fibrillation and/or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (n=11). Non-invasive evaluation of ventricular refractoriness via esophageal electrode and ICD telemetry vs. Sinus rhythm measurements was evaluated on Maximal dispersion of estimated ventricular effective refractory periods (VERPs) between the right ventricular apex and posterior left ventricle during induced VF. The maximal dispersion of estimated ventricular effective refractory periods during induced ventricular fibrillation between the right ventricular apex and posterior left ventricle was 40 ± 27 ms.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: