Key result
Longer RV-LV activation delay at CRT implant is linked to ~56% lower HF or death.
Why the study?
Data on longer right to left ventricular activation delay predicting clinical outcome after CRT in LBBB patients are limited.
Does a longer right to left ventricular activation delay at CRT implantation improve clinical outcomes in heart failure patients with LBBB?
Cohort (n=125)
No
Does a longer right to left ventricular activation delay at CRT implantation improve clinical outcomes in heart failure patients with LBBB?
Hazard Ratio: 0.44 (95% CI 0.23–0.82)
Absolute Event Rate: 29% vs 53%
p-value: p=0.001
A longer right to left ventricular activation delay (≥ 86 ms) at CRT implantation is associated with significantly improved clinical outcomes and reverse remodeling specifically in heart failure patients with LBBB.
May inform CRT candidate selection; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized validation before practice change.
AIMS: Data on longer right to left ventricular activation delay (RV-LV AD) predicting clinical outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by left bundle branch block (LBBB) are limited. We aimed to evaluate the impact of RV-LV AD on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), ejection fraction (EF), and clinical outcome in patients implanted with CRT, stratified by LBBB at baseline. METHODS AND RESULTS: Heart failure (HF) patients undergoing CRT implantation with EF ≤ 35% and QRS ≥ 120 ms were evaluated based on their RV-LV AD at implantation. Baseline and 6-month clinical parameters, EF, and NT-proBNP values were assessed. The primary endpoint was HF or death, the secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality. A total of 125 patients with CRT were studied, 62% had LBBB. During the median follow-up of 2.2 years, 44 (35%) patients had HF/death, 36 (29%) patients died. Patients with RV-LV AD ≥ 86 ms (lower quartile) had significantly lower risk of HF/death [hazard ratio (HR): 0.44; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.23-0.82; P = 0.001] and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.23-1.00; P = 0.05), compared with those with RV-LV AD < 86 ms. Patients with RV-LV AD ≥ 86 ms and LBBB showed the greatest improvement in EF (28-36%; P<0.001), NT-proBNP (2771-1216 ng/mL; P < 0.001), and they had better HF-free survival (HR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.11-0.49, P < 0.001) and overall survival (HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16-0.75; P = 0.007). There was no difference in outcome by RV-LV AD in non-LBBB patients. CONCLUSION: Left bundle branch block patients with longer RV-LV activation delay at CRT implantation had greater improvement in NT-proBNP, EF, and significantly better clinical outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kosztin et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=125). Right to left ventricular activation delay (RV-LV AD) ≥ 86 ms vs. RV-LV AD < 86 ms was evaluated on Heart failure episodes requiring hospitalization or all-cause mortality (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.82, p=0.001). A right to left ventricular activation delay ≥ 86 ms at CRT implantation was associated with a 56% lower risk of heart failure or death compared to a shorter delay (HR 0.44).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: