Key result
Frequent defibrillator testing, such as three daily low-energy charge and discharge cycles over 5 years, does not significantly stress components or accelerate device failure.
Why the study?
Does frequent testing accelerate defibrillator failure?
Does frequent testing accelerate defibrillator failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Frequent testing of defibrillators does not significantly stress components or accelerate device failure.
In Reply.— Dr Bashein raises the interesting point that perhaps overtesting can wear out a defibrillator and lead to premature defibrillator failure. In actuality, three daily low-energy charge and discharge cycles, even if performed over the first 5 years of a defibrillator's life, do not significantly stress the components. Such activity is well within the performance capabilities of currently manufactured devices. Three discharges a day for 5 years constitute only 5475 shocks. Though impressive in number, these represent only a small proportion of a defibrillator's total discharge capacity. The membership of our Defibrillator Working Group included representatives from the Emergency Care Research Institute and the Health Industry Manufacturers Association. They expressed general agreement that frequent testing will not accelerate device failure. Dr Bashein's suggestion that frequent clinical use can substitute for discharge testing, while reasonable on the surface, raises several major concerns. One concern is that inclusion of actual clinical
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard O. Cummins (1991) conducted a letter in Defibrillator failure. Frequent defibrillator testing vs. Clinical use was evaluated on Defibrillator failure. Frequent defibrillator testing, such as three daily low-energy charge and discharge cycles over 5 years, does not significantly stress components or accelerate device failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: