Key result
Allopurinol improves post-reperfusion contractile recovery to 68% of baseline vs saline in preclinical model.
Why the study?
The mechanism for oxygen free radical production causing postischemic myocardial dysfunction (stunning) remains unknown, with xanthine oxidase as a potential source.
Does intravenous allopurinol improve recovery of contractile function in open-chest dogs undergoing LAD occlusion and reperfusion?
Comparison
Intravenous allopurinol vs intravenous saline
Design
Preclinical experimental study
Follow-up
4 hours
Authors
Loading...
Should not change clinical reperfusion practice; leaves open whether xanthine oxidase inhibition improves human postischemic recovery.
Does intravenous allopurinol improve recovery of contractile function in open-chest dogs undergoing LAD occlusion and reperfusion?
Absolute Event Rate: 68% vs -17%
p-value: p=<0.001
Allopurinol improves recovery of contractile function in a canine model of myocardial stunning, suggesting xanthine oxidase is a source of oxygen free radicals responsible for postischemic dysfunction.
Charlat et al. (1987) studied Postischemic myocardial dysfunction (myocardial stunning) (n=27). Allopurinol vs. Saline was evaluated on Recovery of contractile function (expressed as percent of preocclusion values) at 4 hours (p=<0.001). Allopurinol significantly improved the recovery of contractile function compared to saline at 4 hours post-reperfusion (68% vs -17% of preocclusion values, P<0.001) in a canine model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: