Key result
High PT ratio variability linked to ~8-fold higher thromboembolism risk after mechanical valve replacement.
Why the study?
Optimal control of blood anticoagulation to maximize antithrombotic protection after mechanical cardiac valve replacement was not well defined.
Does high variability in prothrombin time (PT) ratios predict thromboembolic events in patients after mechanical heart valve replacement?
Cohort (n=96)
No
Does high variability in prothrombin time (PT) ratios predict thromboembolic events in patients after mechanical heart valve replacement?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.5% vs 0.9%
High variability in prothrombin time ratios is a strong predictor of thromboembolic events following mechanical cardiac valve replacement.
High PT variability may flag elevated thromboembolic risk after mechanical valve replacement; hypothesis-generating pending prospective trials.
OBJECTIVE: To assess optimal control of blood anticoagulation to maximize antithrombotic protection after mechanical cardiac valve replacement. DESIGN: A population-based study of 96 patients with a mean follow-up of 7.7 years (range, 1 month to 23 years) was performed in Olmsted County, Minnesota, and 10,301 prothrombin time (PT) ratios were determined after mechanical heart valve replacement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PT ratios were analyzed in a new time-dependent Cox proportional-hazards model by defining an algorithm for comparing variability in PT ratios at each month of follow-up and relating these to thromboembolic events. The new method was compared with several conventional time-independent definitions. RESULTS: During 740 person-years of follow-up, 19 of 96 patients (20%) had 27 thromboembolic events. Of these 19 patients, 8 (42%) had events within 3 months after valve replacement. Freedom from any thromboembolic event was 72% at 15 years. The event rate was high (7.5% per year) during high variability and low (0.9% per year) during low variability in the PT ratio. This relationship was lost when time dependence was removed. More PT ratios were less than 1.5 during high (27%) than during low (19%) variability. Several conventional definitions of adequacy of anticoagulation that averaged PT ratios before a thromboembolic event or throughout follow-up or that compared the proportion of PT ratios above or below a fixed ratio did not define or only partially defined different thromboembolic risks. CONCLUSION: Periods of high and low variability of PT ratios define high and low risk of thromboembolism, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huber et al. (1997) conducted a cohort in Mechanical cardiac valve replacement (n=96). High variability in prothrombin time (PT) ratio vs. Low variability in PT ratio was evaluated on Thromboembolic events. High variability in prothrombin time ratios was associated with a higher rate of thromboembolic events compared to low variability (7.5% vs 0.9% per year) after mechanical valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: