Key result
Standard IV amiodarone dosing yields subtherapeutic plasma levels in ~38% of patients within 16 hours.
Why the study?
Pharmacokinetics of intravenous amiodarone are incompletely characterised, and plasma concentration data are needed to optimise antiarrhythmic efficacy.
Does the standard intravenous amiodarone dosing regimen achieve therapeutic plasma concentrations in patients?
Observational (n=8)
Does the standard intravenous amiodarone dosing regimen achieve therapeutic plasma concentrations in patients?
Standard intravenous amiodarone dosing regimens may result in subtherapeutic plasma concentrations in the early hours of infusion, suggesting higher doses might be needed.
Offers preliminary amiodarone concentration data in small cohort; leaves open therapeutic target validation and dosing optimization.
Amiodarone is a useful antiarrhythmic agent whose pharmacokinetics are incompletely characterised. In order to optimise efficacy of an antiarrhythmic drug, information regarding plasma concentrations achieved during use of the drug is necessary. We report plasma amiodarone and desethylamiodarone concentrations in eight patients following intravenous infusion at a rate of 175 mg h-1 for the first 2 h, followed by infusion at a rate of 50 mg h-1 for a further 46 h a regimen very similar to that recommended by the manufacturers. In at least three of eight patients plasma concentrations were below the suggested therapeutic range of 1.0-2.5 mg l-1 from 3 to 16 h after the infusion was started. Our data suggests that larger doses of intravenous amiodarone than those previously recommended may be necessary to obtain optimal benefit from the drug.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watt et al. (1986) reported an observational. Intravenous amiodarone was evaluated on Plasma amiodarone and desethylamiodarone concentrations. Intravenous amiodarone at standard doses resulted in subtherapeutic plasma concentrations (<1.0 mg/L) in at least 3 of 8 patients between 3 and 16 hours after infusion start.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: