Theoretical analysis proposes a continuous cosmic mass circulation framework in dynamic mass flow cosmology, suggesting black holes act as cyclic transformation boundaries rather than terminal sinks.
Short Abstract This paper proposes a cosmic mass circulation model within the Black Hole Fractal Steady-State Universe (BFSSU) and Dynamic Mass Flow (DMF) framework. Rather than treating cosmic matter evolution as a one-way sequence from primordial nucleosynthesis to stellar evolution and eventual gravitational collapse, the model interprets it as a continuous cyclic transformation of mass states. The proposed circulation is expressed schematically as: DMF background flow → light-element formation → star formation → heavy-element synthesis → planetary formation → black-hole accretion → return to DMF. Within this framework, black holes are reinterpreted not merely as terminal sinks of matter, but as transition boundaries through which observable matter may return to a more fundamental DMF state. Conversely, under appropriate confinement conditions, DMF may undergo phase transitions and re-emerge as observable matter, beginning with light elements such as hydrogen and helium. This perspective connects processes usually treated separately—black-hole accretion, nucleosynthesis, stellar evolution, planetary formation, and cosmic mass conservation—within a single large-scale circulation structure. The model therefore reframes the long-term fate of cosmic mass from a problem of ultimate termination into one of continuous transformation and recirculation. The present study is primarily conceptual and does not claim a completed quantitative formulation. Instead, it establishes the structural foundation of the BFSSU/DMF cosmic mass circulation model and identifies future requirements for mathematical formulation, observational constraints, and falsifiable tests. https://orcid.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takafumi Matsuoka (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: