Key result
Pulmonary embolectomy for fulminant PE shows ~20% perioperative mortality with favorable long-term outcomes.
Why the study?
Surgical intervention for fulminant pulmonary embolism is now mainly reserved for patients with failure of or contraindication to thrombolytic therapy, which may affect operative risks and late outcomes.
Does pulmonary embolectomy improve survival and functional outcomes in patients with fulminant pulmonary embolism, and does prior thrombolysis alter these risks?
Population
36 patients with fulminant pulmonary embolism and compromised circulatory conditions
Design
Retrospective observational study
Follow-up
Mean 119 months
Authors
Loading...
Second-line surgical embolectomy for fulminant PE remains hypothesis-generating; prospective trials needed to clarify risks and selection.
Observational (n=36)
Does pulmonary embolectomy improve survival and functional outcomes in patients with fulminant pulmonary embolism, and does prior thrombolysis alter these risks?
Absolute Event Rate: 20% vs 26%
Pulmonary embolectomy for fulminant pulmonary embolism yields excellent long-term functional outcomes, with early mortality primarily driven by preoperative cardiac arrest rather than previous thrombolysis.
Doerge et al. (1996) conducted an observational in Fulminant pulmonary embolism (n=36). Pulmonary embolectomy (1990-1994 cohort) vs. Pulmonary embolectomy (1979-1989 cohort) was evaluated on Perioperative mortality rate. Pulmonary embolectomy for fulminant pulmonary embolism resulted in a perioperative mortality of 26% in the 1979-1989 cohort and 20% in the 1990-1994 cohort, with excellent long-term outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: