Key result
Temporary LVEF recovery followed by decline linked to ~3-fold higher CV death or HF hospitalization.
Why the study?
Some patients with heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) experience subsequent decline in LVEF after improvement, and their prognosis is uncertain.
Cohort (n=399)
Hazard Ratio: 2.95 (95% CI 1.55–5.63)
Patients with temporary HFimpEF who experience a subsequent decline in LVEF have a similarly poor prognosis as those with persistent HFrEF.
Background: Some patients of heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) have subsequent decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after improvement, and their prognosis is uncertain. Aims: We aimed to examine the clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis of this sub-population of HFimpEF. Methods: We examined 399 consecutive patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, LVEF ≤ 40 %) with LVEF data at both baseline and follow-up in the CHART-2 Study. We classified them as follows; persistent HFrEF group (LVEF ≤ 40 % at 1-year and 2-year follow-up, n = 238), temporary HFimpEF group (≥10 % increase from baseline with LVEF > 40 % at 1-year follow-up but LVEF ≤ 40 % at 2-year follow-up, n = 22), and persistent HFimpEF group (≥10 % increase from baseline with LVEF > 40 % at 1-year follow-up, and LVEF > 40 % at 2-year follow-up, n = 139). Results: The temporary HFimpEF group (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.95; 95 % CI: 1.55-5.63) and the persistent HFrEF group (2.53; 1.75-3.67) were associated with increased risks for the composite of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization. The risk factors for decline in LVEF included LVEF (adjusted odds ratio: 0.80; 95 %CI: 0.69-0.90), LV end-diastolic dimension (LVDd) (1.14; 1.05-1.25), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels (1.04 per 10 pg/mL increase; 1.00-1.08), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels (0.95; 0.92-0.99) and serum sodium levels (0.70; 0.50-0.91) at 1-year follow-up. Conclusions: These results indicate that patients with HFrecEF account for 23% of those with HFrEF and that 12% of them have subsequent decline in LVEF associated with similar worse prognosis as in those with persistent HFrEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takigahira et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=399). Temporary HFimpEF (subsequent decline in LVEF after improvement) vs. Persistent HFimpEF was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization (HR 2.95, 95% CI 1.55-5.63). Temporary improvement in ejection fraction followed by a decline was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization (HR 2.95; 95% CI 1.55-5.63).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: