Key result
In patients with heart failure, improved left ventricular ejection fraction was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to stable or decreased LVEF (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.63-0.82).
Why the study?
Heart failure with improved ejection fraction is linked to improved outcomes, but the clinical significance of left ventricular ejection fraction increases in patients without heart failure is less known.
Does LVEF improvement reduce all-cause mortality in cardiovascular patients with and without heart failure?
Cohort (n=31,920)
Does LVEF improvement reduce all-cause mortality in cardiovascular patients with and without heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 0.72 (95% CI 0.63–0.82)
Absolute Event Rate: 9.1% vs 11%
p-value: p=0.029
Temporal increase of LVEF is associated with improved survival in patients with heart failure, but not in cardiovascular patients without heart failure.
Introduction Heart failure (HF) with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) was shown to be related with improved outcome but increase of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients without HF is of less known clinical significance. Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate long-term prognosis in patients with different cardiovascular disorders, with and without HF, depending on temporal variations of LVEF. Methods The study covered 31 920 patients (median age 71 years, 37.7% females) with different cardiovascular disorders and at least two measurements of LVEF separated by ≥1 month. Clinical parameters were acquired from database of Academic Repository of Clinical Cases of Medical University of Silesia. HFimpEF was defined by LVEF increase ≥10% in HF patients in relation to baseline value. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results The median follow-up time was 51.5 months and LVEF was measured median 2 times. HF was diagnosed in 12 152 patients (38.1%), of which 2 843 (23.4%) experienced HFimpEF. Mortality was greater in HF than non-HF patients (11.4% vs. 3.6%, p<0.001). In patients with HF, Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed significantly lower mortality in HFimpEF than in stable and decreased LVEF (Figure; 9.1% vs. 11.0% vs. 24.5%; log-rank p=0.029 and p<0.001) and HFimpEF constituted one of independent predictors of mortality (HR=0.72, 95% CI:0.63-0.82). Conversely, in non-HF population patients with LVEF improvement had higher mortality than patients with stable LVEF and lower than deteriorating LVEF (Figure; 4.8% vs. 3.2% vs. 15.0%; log-rank p=0.001 and p<0.001) and LVEF improvement was not associated with survival. Conclusions Temporal increase of LVEF corresponds with improved survival in patients with HF but not among non-HF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wybraniec et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disorders with and without heart failure (n=31,920). Improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF increase ≥10%) vs. Stable or decreased LVEF was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.82, p=0.029). In patients with heart failure, improved left ventricular ejection fraction was associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to stable or decreased LVEF (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.63-0.82).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: