Key result
Catheterization-derived pressure-based RVEF correlates with MRI RVEF and tracks response to oral combination therapy.
Why the study?
Pressure-based RVEF estimation from routine right heart catheterisation and its correlation with MRI-derived RVEF in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients required evaluation.
Does pressure-based right ventricular ejection fraction estimated from routine right heart catheterisation correlate with RVEF from magnetic resonance imaging in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Observational
Does pressure-based right ventricular ejection fraction estimated from routine right heart catheterisation correlate with RVEF from magnetic resonance imaging in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Pressure-derived RVEF from routine right heart catheterization correlates well with MRI-derived RVEF and can track responses to initial oral combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
May offer accessible RV monitoring via routine RHC in PAH; leaves open need for outcome validation before practice change.
In patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, pressure-based right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) estimated from routine right heart catheterisation correlated with RVEF from magnetic resonance imaging. A framework combining Weibull distribution-derived theoretical isovolumic pressure and time-varying elastance-derived end-systolic pressure showed the closest correlation and was responsive to initial oral combination therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanagasingam et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pressure-based right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) estimation vs. RVEF from magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated on Correlation between pressure-based RVEF and MRI-derived RVEF. Pressure-based right ventricular ejection fraction estimated from right heart catheterisation correlated with MRI-derived RVEF and was responsive to initial oral combination therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: