Key result
Pravastatin pretreatment reduces phenylephrine-induced vasoconstriction by ~34% in isolated small vessels.
Why the study?
Direct effects of therapeutically relevant statin concentrations on vasoconstrictor responsiveness in microvascular resistance vessels had not been examined.
Does pravastatin reduce vasoconstrictor responses in isolated rat mesenteric small vessels?
Does pravastatin reduce vasoconstrictor responses in isolated rat mesenteric small vessels?
Pravastatin acutely inhibits vasoconstrictor responses in small vessels by increasing endothelial NO bioavailability via the Akt pathway.
Hypothesis-generating for acute statin vascular effects in vitro; requires in vivo and human confirmation before any clinical relevance.
BACKGROUND: Statins have been shown to inhibit conduit vessel constrictor responses via the endothelial nitric oxide (NO) pathway. Clinical studies have implicated an effect in microvascular resistance vessels; however, direct effects of therapeutically relevant statin concentrations have not been examined. We examined the effect of acute pravastatin pretreatment on vasoconstrictor responsiveness of isolated rat mesenteric small vessels. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pravastatin (112 nmol/L) pretreatment for 60 min reduced both the potency and maximal constrictor responses to phenylephrine, thromboxane (U46619) and serotonin in small vessels. This effect was abolished by endothelial denudation, NO synthase (NOS) inhibition with N-ω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME 300 µmol/L) and Akt inhibition (Akt1/2 kinase inhibitor 500 nmol/L), confirming an endothelium-dependent mechanism and implicating a NO-mediated effect via the Akt pathway. Maximal superoxide scavenging with polyethylene glycol-superoxide dismutase (PEG-SOD), 150 U/ml did not influence phenylephrine constrictor responses but potentiated pravastatin's effect, suggesting that the statin did not increase NO bioavailability merely via an antioxidant mechanism. In contrast, pravastatin did not affect endothelin-1 (ET-1) constrictor responses. However, after pre-incubation with a selective endothelin-B (ET(B)) receptor antagonist (BQ788 3 µmol/L) pravastatin inhibited ET-1 constriction, suggesting that its effect is via the same mechanistic pathway as the ET(B) receptor. CONCLUSIONS: In small vessels, pravastatin inhibits constrictor responses by increasing endothelial NO bioavailability via the Akt pathway. Furthermore, ET(B) receptor blockade unmasks this effect in ET-1 constrictor responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghaffari et al. (2011) studied Vasoconstrictor responses in small vessels. Pravastatin vs. Control (vehicle) was evaluated on Maximal constrictor response (Emax) to phenylephrine (% of high-potassium physiological salt solution response) (reduced by 34%, p=<0.05). Pravastatin pretreatment for 60 minutes significantly reduced the maximal constrictor response to phenylephrine by 34% in isolated rat mesenteric small vessels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: