Key result
Reperfusion reduces ischemic endocardial 99mTc-sestamibi retention by ~60% in a canine MI model.
Why the study?
The study aimed to validate myocardial uptake and retention of 99mTc-sestamibi after reperfusion as markers of tissue viability and to assess changes during reperfusion in a canine myocardial infarction model.
Does the timing of 99mTc-sestamibi administration and imaging affect the estimation of myocardial salvage in a canine model of ischemia and reperfusion?
Does the timing of 99mTc-sestamibi administration and imaging affect the estimation of myocardial salvage in a canine model of ischemia and reperfusion?
99mTc-sestamibi uptake and retention depend on myocardial viability and regional flow; early imaging after reperfusion may significantly overestimate myocardial salvage.
Early post-reperfusion 99mTc-sestamibi imaging may overestimate salvage; leaves open optimal timing for clinical viability assessment.
BACKGROUND: 99mTc-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile (Sestamibi) is a new perfusion agent that has shown promise for the noninvasive detection of myocardial salvage after coronary reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction. The objective of this study was to further validate that myocardial uptake and retention of Sestamibi after reperfusion in a canine myocardial infarction model are markers of tissue viability. The hypotheses tested were that if Sestamibi is given early after reperfusion and myocardial uptake is quantitated soon afterward, the degree of ultimate myocardial salvage will be overestimated, and that there will be continued loss of myocardial Sestamibi from ischemic tissue during 3 hours of reperfusion due to accelerated release of Sestamibi from cells already irreversibly injured during the phase of coronary occlusion, reperfusion injury to myocytes still viable early after reflow, or a combination of both mechanisms. METHODS AND RESULTS: In protocol 1, 8.0 mCi Sestamibi was injected intravenously in anesthetized dogs 2-5 minutes after reperfusion preceded by 3 hours of left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) occlusion. Animals were killed either 5 minutes (n = 7) or 3 hours (n = 9) after Sestamibi administration. Mean endocardial Sestamibi activity was 74 +/- 3% of nonischemic activity in dogs killed early and 31 +/- 2% of nonischemic activity in dogs killed late after Sestamibi administration, indicating myocardial loss of Sestamibi during 3 hours of reflow. Regional flow (percent nonischemic) at the time of Sestamibi administration (2-5 minutes after reperfusion) was comparable in dogs killed early (144 +/- 23%) and dogs killed late (118 +/- 4%, p = NS). In protocol 2, Sestamibi was given intravenously at baseline under normal conditions followed by 3 hours of LAD occlusion and either 4 (n = 6), 30 (n = 9), or 180 minutes (n = 10) of reperfusion. At postmortem, myocardial slices were imaged for quantification of defect magnitude and regional flow (radiolabeled microspheres), and tissue Sestamibi activities were determined by gamma well counting. Coronary sinus Sestamibi activity was serially measured. In these dogs, which were preloaded with Sestamibi at baseline, 3 hours of LAD occlusion followed by 3 hours of reperfusion resulted in a loss of Sestamibi in the endocardial zone of the ischemic region to 40 +/- 6% of nonischemic levels (p < 0.0001). This loss corresponded to a sustained elevation of coronary sinus activity throughout the reflow period. The loss of myocardial Sestamibi was significantly greater than that observed in dogs killed 4 or 30 minutes after reflow. Defect magnitude also worsened over 3 hours of reperfusion as assessed by gamma camera imaging of slices of the excised hearts. CONCLUSIONS: These experimental data suggest that Sestamibi uptake and retention are dependent on myocardial viability as well as regional flow. If Sestamibi is administered early after reperfusion and imaging is performed soon afterward, the degree of myocardial salvage could be significantly overestimated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beller et al. (1993) studied Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (n=41). 99mTc-sestamibi vs. Different reperfusion time points was evaluated on Endocardial Sestamibi activity as a percentage of nonischemic activity (p=<0.0001). In a canine myocardial infarction model, 99mTc-sestamibi was lost from the endocardial zone of the ischemic region to 40% of nonischemic levels after 3 hours of reperfusion (p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: