Key result
3D TEE accurately measures right ventricular volume with minimal ~1 mL bias versus cross-sectional methods.
Why the study?
The value of transesophageal 3-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volume compared with standard cross-sectional methods in children with atrial septal defects was investigated.
Does transesophageal 3-dimensional echocardiography yield comparable right ventricular volume measurements to cross-sectional echocardiography in children with atrial septal defects?
Cross-Sectional (n=15)
Does transesophageal 3-dimensional echocardiography yield comparable right ventricular volume measurements to cross-sectional echocardiography in children with atrial septal defects?
Cross-sectional echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volumes using the area-length method is reasonably reliable compared to 3-dimensional echocardiography in children with atrial septal defects.
The study was designed to investigate the value of assessing right ventricular volume by transoesophageal 3-dimensional echocardiographic techniques compared with the standard transoesophageal cross-sectional approach. Echocardiography was performed using a multiplane probe. The 3-dimensional data sets were reconstructed after electrocardiographic and respiratory gated scanning, calculating the 3-dimensional volumes by the method of multiple slices. Cross-sectional determination of volume was performed using a modified area-length method, and the biplane multiple slice method following Simpson's rule. We studied 15 patients, with ages ranging from 6 to 19 years, and body surface areas from 1.1 to 1.67 square metres. It proved possible top determine volumes with both methods in all patients. As determined by 3-dimensional echo, volumes were greater, being 113.0 plus or minus 61.2 millilitres at end-systole, and 61.7 plus or minus 36 millilitres at end-diastole, than those calculated from cross-sectional images using Simpson's rule, which gave values of 92.5 plus or minus 52 millilitres, and 41.3 plus or minus 22 millilitres. Compared to the values obtained using the area-length method, at 116.9 plus or minus 61 millilitres, and 60.3 plus or minus 30 millilitres, there were only small differences at end-systole, with a bias of 1.4, and limits of agreement of 20.9 millilitres, as well as at end-diastole, when bias was minus 3.8, and limits of agreement 22.3 millilitres. Correlation was also good, with coefficients of 0.93, and 0.91, respectively. The mean difference between the volumes by 3-dimensional acquisition and the multiple slice method was larger, with higher limits of agreement, at end-diastole showing bias of 20.5, and limits of agreement of 30.1 millilitres, and for end-systole bias of 20.4, and limits of agreement of 32.2 millilitres. Our data confirm that cross-sectional echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volumes in children with atrial septal defects is quick, and reasonably reliable in clinical practice when employing the area-length method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heusch et al. (2006) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial septal defects (n=15). Transesophageal 3-dimensional echocardiography vs. Transesophageal cross-sectional echocardiography was evaluated on Right ventricular volume at end-systole (bias 1.4). Transesophageal 3-dimensional echocardiography showed small bias (1.4 mL at end-systole) and good correlation compared to the cross-sectional area-length method for right ventricular volume.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: