Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 1, 2000Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Prediction of Defibrillation Outcome by Epicardial Activation Patterns Following Shocks Near the Defibrillation Threshold

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Successful defibrillation shocks produce longer intercycle intervals and faster conduction starting at cycle 2.

  • P<0.01
  • n=5

Why the study?

The relationship between defibrillation outcome and postshock epicardial activation patterns for shocks near the defibrillation threshold was unclear.

Does the postshock epicardial activation pattern predict defibrillation outcome in a pig model of ventricular fibrillation?

Population

5 pigs with induced ventricular fibrillation

Comparison

Successful versus failed defibrillation episodes at approximately ED50 shock strength

Design

Preclinical study with epicardial activation mapping using a 504-electrode array

Authors

Nipon Chattipakorn
Nipon ChattipakornElectrophysiology
PFParwis FotuhiTulane UniversityRIRaymond E. IdekerElectrophysiology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Postshock activation patterns may predict defibrillation outcome in this porcine model; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change clinical practice.

Structured PICO

Does the postshock epicardial activation pattern predict defibrillation outcome in a pig model of ventricular fibrillation?

P
Population
5 pigs undergoing ventricular fibrillation to evaluate epicardial activation patterns following defibrillation shocks.
I
Intervention
10 shocks of approximately ED50 strength (right ventricle-superior vena cava, biphasic, 6/4 msec) delivered after 10 seconds of ventricular fibrillation
C
Comparator
Comparison between successful and failed defibrillation episodes
O
Outcome
Epicardial activation sequences following shocks, including intercycle interval (ICI), wavefront conduction time (WCT), and overlapping indexsurrogate

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.01

An overlapping index >1 in postshock epicardial activation cycles is a marker that predicts failed defibrillation in a porcine model.

Cite This Study

Chattipakorn et al. (2000) studied Ventricular fibrillation (n=5). Defibrillation shocks near ED50 strength vs. Failed defibrillation shocks was evaluated on Intercycle interval (ICI) and wavefront conduction time (WCT) starting at cycle 2 (p=<0.01). Successful defibrillation shocks were characterized by longer intercycle intervals and shorter wavefront conduction times starting at the second postshock cycle compared to failed shocks (P<0.01).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aba04599d974145c0986b34https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2000.tb00174.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Relationship between "extension of refractoriness" and probability of successful defibrillation1997 · 29 citations
  2. 2Patterns of Ventricular Activity During Catheter Defibrillation1974 · 121 citations
  3. 3The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: Reappraisal of the “defibrillation threshold” concept1987 · 217 citations
  4. 4Three-dimensional potential gradient fields generated by intracardiac catheter and cutaneous patch electrodes.1992 · 92 citations
  5. 5Mechanism of ventricular vulnerability to single premature stimuli in open-chest dogs.1988 · 286 citations