Key result
Successful defibrillation shocks produce longer intercycle intervals and faster conduction starting at cycle 2.
Why the study?
The relationship between defibrillation outcome and postshock epicardial activation patterns for shocks near the defibrillation threshold was unclear.
Does the postshock epicardial activation pattern predict defibrillation outcome in a pig model of ventricular fibrillation?
Population
5 pigs with induced ventricular fibrillation
Comparison
Successful versus failed defibrillation episodes at approximately ED50 shock strength
Design
Preclinical study with epicardial activation mapping using a 504-electrode array
Authors
Loading...
Postshock activation patterns may predict defibrillation outcome in this porcine model; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change clinical practice.
Does the postshock epicardial activation pattern predict defibrillation outcome in a pig model of ventricular fibrillation?
p-value: p=<0.01
An overlapping index >1 in postshock epicardial activation cycles is a marker that predicts failed defibrillation in a porcine model.
Chattipakorn et al. (2000) studied Ventricular fibrillation (n=5). Defibrillation shocks near ED50 strength vs. Failed defibrillation shocks was evaluated on Intercycle interval (ICI) and wavefront conduction time (WCT) starting at cycle 2 (p=<0.01). Successful defibrillation shocks were characterized by longer intercycle intervals and shorter wavefront conduction times starting at the second postshock cycle compared to failed shocks (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: