Key result
Higher pulsatile frequency dampens oscillatory shear rate variability without altering mean shear rate.
Why the study?
The effect of pulsatile frequency on wall shear rate in a compliant human aortic bifurcation model and its implications for atherosclerotic susceptibility were unclear.
Does pulsatile frequency affect wall shear rate in a compliant cast of a human aortic bifurcation?
Does pulsatile frequency affect wall shear rate in a compliant cast of a human aortic bifurcation?
Increasing pulsatile frequency in an aortic bifurcation model alters oscillatory shear rate without affecting mean shear rate, which may influence atherosclerotic susceptibility at vulnerable sites.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compliant aortic bifurcation models enable precise shear rate mapping across pulsatile frequencies; leaves open in vivo relevance and clinical translation.
A realistically compliant flow-through cast of a human aortic bifurcation was perfused with two almost identical physiological flow waves differing in pulsatile frequency. Near-wall fluid velocities were measured with a laser Doppler velocimeter at 14 sites along the flow divider and the lateral walls of the aorta and iliac arteries. The wall position at each site was tracked using a linescan camera. The temporal wall shear rate at each site was then calculated from the near-wall velocity profile and the instantaneous wall position. Increasing the frequency reduced the oscillatory component of shear rate at sites where it was greater than average, and increased it at sites where it was less, effectively reducing its site to site variability. Pulsatile frequency had no significant effect on mean shear rate at most sites. The phase shift between wall shear and radial strain was governed by the phase of the shear, and was linearly related to the extent of site dependent shear reversal. The mean shear rate was inversely related to the extent of shear reversal. If atherosclerotic development depends chiefly on mean shear rate, heart rate would not be expected to affect susceptibility, however, if only the wall sites experiencing the lowest maximum shears are vulnerable, then the effect of increasing the heart rate would seem to be beneficial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuban et al. (1995) studied this question. Pulsatile frequency vs. Different pulsatile frequency was evaluated on Wall shear rate and phase shift between wall shear and radial strain. Increasing pulsatile frequency reduced the oscillatory component of shear rate at sites where it was greater than average, effectively reducing site-to-site variability without affecting mean shear rate.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: