Key result
Higher quality of life strongly correlates with higher LVEF in heart failure.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate quality of life in heart failure patients and its correlation with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).
Cross-Sectional (n=19)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To evaluate the quality of life of patients with heart failure and correlate it with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Method: This is a crosssectional study with a sample of 19 patients, mean age of 66.28 ± 10.93 years, whose quality of life was assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ); for each question a domain of ICF was given whose results were then correlated. Results: The average MLHFQ questionnaire score was 61.21 ± 17.56. There was a positive correlation between the quality of life and left ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.75; p = 0.0006), which was not seen when comparing the quality of life with functional class. There was a high correlation between patient outcomes and the assessment of the physiotherapist using the ICF. Conclusions: The MLFHQ questionnaire includes the requirements of the ICF, showing a high correlation between its responses and those from the ICF, and is considered global, which allows these instruments to be used in evaluating patients with congestive heart failure (CHF)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaponi et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Congestive heart failure (n=19). Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and ICF assessment was evaluated on Correlation between quality of life and left ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.75, p=0.0006). In patients with congestive heart failure, quality of life assessed by the MLHFQ showed a positive correlation with left ventricular ejection fraction and a high correlation with the ICF.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: