Key result
Mosaic bioprosthesis shows ~11% 17-year survival with low structural valve deterioration rates.
Why the study?
Mid- to long-term data on the performance and durability of the Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position were needed after its clinical introduction.
Cohort (n=272)
No
Single-center Mosaic valve data now available; leaves open questions of durability and generalizability in wider use.
BACKGROUND: The Mosaic bioprosthesis (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States), a stented porcine aortic valve, combines glutaraldehyde fixation with zero-pressure, root-pressure techniques and antimineralization treatment with amino-oleic acid for improved hemodynamics and tissue durability. The first device has been implanted worldwide at the authors' institution in September 1993. The aim of the present study was to collect mid- to long-term data of the prosthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 272 patients (124 males and 148 females) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement with the Mosaic bioprosthesis between September 1993 and August 2007. Median age at implant was 76.8 years (range, 31.3 to 90.7). Median follow-up was 12.0 years (range, 0 to 17.2 years); follow-up was complete for 223 (82%) patients. RESULTS: Early mortality (30 days) was 4% (12 patients). Overall survival at 5, 10, 15, and 17 years was 68.6% ± 3.1%, 36.4% ± 3.3%, 17.1% ± 3.6%, and 10.7% ± 4.3%, respectively. Eleven late deaths (5%) were cardiac related. There were 24 thromboembolic events, 1 hemorrhagic, and 6 reoperations/explants. At a median follow-up of 12 years, freedom from any cause of death was 27.0% ± 3.2% acting as a competing risk for the incidence of thromboembolic events (16.4% ± 3.5%), hemorrhage (0.5% ± 0.5%), and reoperation/explant (4.1% ± 1.8%). Two redos were due to structural valve deterioration (SVD), two for nonstructural dysfunction (paravalvular leakage), one for thrombosed prosthesis, and one for endocarditis. CONCLUSIONS: Performance and late outcome of the Mosaic bioprosthesis was satisfactory during 17 years after clinical introduction. The Mosaic bioprosthesis showed low incidence of SVD or need for reoperation in the long term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hapfelmeier et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve disease requiring replacement (n=272). Mosaic bioprosthesis was evaluated on Overall survival at 17 years. The Mosaic bioprosthesis demonstrated satisfactory long-term performance, with an overall survival of 10.7% at 17 years and a low incidence of structural valve deterioration.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: