Key result
Normal-range renal function variation shows no independent association with carotid intima-media thickness after adjusting for age.
Why the study?
The association between renal function and carotid intima media thickness in non-diabetic individuals is less clear.
Cross-Sectional (n=853)
No
Effect estimate: Standardized β 0.042
p-value: p=0.182
Reassures against overinterpreting normal-range renal function for vascular risk; hypothesis-generating for age-independent effects in longitudinal studies.
AIM: Moderate to severe renal insufficiency and albuminuria have been shown to be independent risk factors for atherosclerosis. However, the association between renal function and intima media thick-ness (IMT) in non-diabetic individuals is less clear. We therefore investigated the relation between renal function, established cardiovascular risk factors and carotid intima media thickness in non-diabetic individuals. METHODS: 853 non-diabetic participants were included in this project. Renal function was estimated using the simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulae, a refit MDRD equation for healthy persons (MDRD-1) or the Jellife 2 formula, an age independent estimate of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Carotid arterial intima-media thickness was measured at the posterior wall of the common carotid artery and the bulbus (IMT(ACC), IMTB(Bulbus)). RESULTS: Weak correlations between IMT(ACC) or IMTB(Bulbus) and MDRD were found (r=-0.105, p= 0.002; r=-0.127, p<0.001). and similiar results were found for MDRD-1. However, adjustment of that relation for age modified the picture. While age was an independent predictor, MDRD or MDRD-1 were not further informative. Further adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors confirmed that relation. Correspondingly, GFR estimated by the age-independent formula Jellife 2 was not correlated with IMT. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that variation of renal function within the normal range is not independently associated with carotid intima media thickness in non-diabetic individuals. Crude correlations between MDRD and IMT appear to reflect the inter-relation among age, eGFR and IMT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bobbert et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Non-diabetic individuals (n=853). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was evaluated on Association between MDRD-estimated GFR and total carotid intima media thickness (IMTTotal) adjusted for age (Standardized β 0.042, p=0.182). Physiological variation of renal function within the normal range is not independently associated with carotid intima media thickness in non-diabetic individuals, as crude correlations are entirely explained by age.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: