Key result
Biventricular direct cardiac compression outperforms isolated ventricular support in acute heart failure hemodynamics.
Why the study?
The relative contributions and mechanisms of biventricular, left ventricular, and right ventricular direct cardiac compression in acute heart failure were unclear.
p-value: p=<0.05
Supports biventricular direct cardiac compression in acute HF models; leaves open translation to human therapy pending clinical trials.
Direct cardiac compression (DCC) with implanted heart patches has previously demonstrated efficacy of biventricular (BiV) support in acute heart failure (HF) sheep. We hypothesized that this was primarily due to a left ventricular (LV) effect. This study compared BiV, LV, and right ventricular (RV) assists in terms of hemodynamic and energetic response. Ten sheep underwent instrumentation and device implantation at least 1 week prior to study. HF (50% reduction in cardiac output) was maintained with intravenous esmolol infusion. BiV, LV, and RV assists were activated randomly with intervening stable HF periods. BiV assist was more effective than either LV or RV assist in restoring hemodynamic parameters; however, there was no difference in efficacy of LV and RV support. RV assist preserved left coronary flow patterns and chamber geometry compared to other assist conditions, but increased LV preload. These results suggest that LV and RV support each make a significant contribution to the efficacy of BiV assist, albeit through different mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gallagher et al. (2006) studied Acute Heart Failure (n=10). Biventricular direct cardiac compression vs. Left ventricular assist, right ventricular assist, and unassisted stable heart failure was evaluated on Hemodynamic response and left ventricular efficiency (p=<0.05). Biventricular direct cardiac compression was more effective than either isolated left or right ventricular assist in restoring hemodynamic parameters and significantly increasing left ventricular efficiency (p<0.05) in an acute heart failure sheep model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: