Key result
Neonatal OPV dose linked to improved seroconversion, yielding systemic antibodies in up to ~60% of infants.
Why the study?
Host response to the regular three-dose OPV schedule is not satisfactory in countries like India where poliomyelitis remains a problem, motivating evaluation of an additional neonatal dose.
Cohort (n=51)
May inform polio strategies in endemic areas; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials before practice change.
Administration of supplementary dose of oral polio vaccine (OPV) during neonatal period is recommended by WHO in countries like India, where host response to the regular to the regular three-dose schedule is not satisfactory and poliomyelitis continues to be a problem. The efficacy of this dose +3, and +5 doses of OPV in terms of seropositivity, seroconversion, systemic, and mucosal antibody responses were measured in 51 infants in a follow-up study from birth to 30 weeks. Administration of the additional dose in the newborn period significantly improved seropositivity and seroconversion rates compared to the conventional 3 or 5 dose schedules. Systemic antibody titres improved with each dose of the vaccine and 40-60 per cent of infants had > 1:128 titres to the three types of polioviruses that could prevent re-infection of the gut and 50 per cent of them had mucosal antibodies as evidenced by specific IgA in nasopharyngeal secretions. Therefore, administration of OPV in the neonatal period should be made compulsory in countries where poliomyelitis still continues to be a problem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
P Bhaskaram (1997) conducted a cohort in Poliomyelitis (n=51). Supplementary dose of oral polio vaccine (OPV) in newborn period vs. Conventional 3 or 5 dose schedules was evaluated on Seropositivity, seroconversion, systemic, and mucosal antibody responses. An additional neonatal dose of OPV improved seroconversion over standard schedules, achieving >1:128 systemic antibody titers in 40-60% of infants and mucosal antibodies in 50%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: