Key result
Radical pericardiectomy successfully resolves delayed constrictive pericarditis triggered by coronary artery perforation during PCI.
Why the study?
Intermediate- to late-term complications of coronary artery perforation (CAP) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have seldom been reported, including the development of constrictive pericarditis (CP).
Case Report (n=1)
No
Highlights rare delayed constrictive pericarditis after coronary perforation; leaves open incidence and surveillance needs.
A 77-year-old man underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at the right coronary artery, which was complicated by coronary artery perforation (CAP). After prolonged balloon tamponade proximal to the CAP there was no more contrast extravasation, and the CAP was thought to have resolved. Computed tomography (CT) and echocardiography the following day did not find evidence of continued bleeding, and the patient was discharged. Echocardiograms and chest CT scans obtained one week and two months after PCI detected no remarkable interval change. The patient complained of progressive dyspnea and abdominal distension seven months after PCI however, and echocardiography found an increased amount of pericardial effusion and constrictive physiology. The patient underwent pericardiectomy due to congestive hepatopathy, and progressive dyspnea. The pericardium was thickened and adhesive, and a dark bloody effusion was found. Pathology was unremarkable except for thick fibrosis. After the operation the patient made full recovery, and is stable three years after surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2023) conducted a case report in Constrictive pericarditis (n=1). Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention was evaluated on Clinical outcome. Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention led to the delayed development of constrictive pericarditis, which was successfully resolved with radical pericardiectomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: