The operating temperature of photovoltaic (PV) modules is a key factor affecting electrical output because heat accumulation reduces voltage, power generation, and conversion efficiency. This study experimentally evaluated a passive thermal-management method using perforated aluminium composite panel (ACP) plates installed on the rear side of a 100 Wp polycrystalline PV module under outdoor conditions. Three perforation diameters, 20, 22.5, and 25 mm, were compared with an uncooled reference panel. Solar irradiance, PV surface temperature, lower-panel/ACP-plate temperature, voltage, current, output power, and efficiency were monitored during a 14-day outdoor campaign, with the detailed profile reported at 15 min intervals. At the peak irradiance of 1009 W/m², the 25 mm configuration recorded a PV panel surface temperature of 42.2 °C and a perforated ACP plate temperature of 38.5 °C, while producing 65.16 W at 16.25 V and 4.01 A, corresponding to an efficiency of 11.75%. The same configuration reached a maximum instantaneous efficiency of 13.29% and the highest mean performance ratio for the reported profile. These findings show that increasing perforation diameter enhanced rear-side heat removal and improved PV electrical performance without auxiliary cooling power.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sofijan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: