Why the study?
Remarkable advances in noninvasive and intravascular diagnostic techniques over the past decade required updating previous guidelines to assist clinicians in selecting tests, diagnosing chronic coronary heart disease, and evaluating risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This JCS 2018 guideline provides comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations for selecting and interpreting noninvasive and invasive diagnostic tests in patients with chronic coronary heart disease.
Recommendations and Levels of Evidence •••••••••••• 404 Pretest Probability and Cardiovascular Risk •••••••••• 405 I. Significance of Various Tests for Diagnosis of Chronic Coronary Heart Disease ••••••••••••••••••••••• 405PAD peripheral arterial disease PCI percutaneous coronary intervention PESP postextrasystolic potentiation PET positron emission tomography PFR peak filling rate QCA quantitative coronary angiography QOL quality of life RCT randomized controlled trial SAE signal-averaged ECG SPECT single photon emission computed tomography TCFA thin-cap fibroatheroma TBI toe-brachial index Tc technetium TOF time-of-flight TPF time-to-peak filling TWA T-wave alternans COR LOE GOR (MINDS) LOE (MINDS) Diagnostic purpose of chronic coronary heart diseases I B C1 IVb COR, class of recommendation; GOR, grade of recommendation; LOE, level of evidence.III C C2 VI Repeated evaluation of cardiac function by echocardiography is not recommended for patients without any changes in clinical status, for whom no change in therapy is planned, and with low risk for cardiovascular events *See Table 55 III C C2 VI COR, class of recommendation; GOR, grade of recommendation; LOE, level of evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamagishi et al. (2021) studied Chronic coronary heart disease. Diagnostic testing modalities (Exercise ECG, Holter ECG, echocardiography, CT, MRI, nuclear imaging, intravascular imaging) was evaluated on Diagnosis and risk assessment of chronic coronary heart disease. Exercise ECG is recommended as a Class I (Level of Evidence B) diagnostic test for chronic coronary heart disease, demonstrating an approximate sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 70%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: