Key result
Baseline heart rate variability fails to predict appropriate ICD interventions in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
The predictive value of heart rate variability measured as SDNN on 24-hour ambulatory ECG for appropriate ICD interventions in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy was uncertain.
Cohort (n=70)
SDNN did not predict appropriate ICD interventions in prophylactic IDC; leaves open whether HRV refines LVEF-based risk stratification.
This study investigated the relation between heart rate variability (HRV) measured as standard deviation of normal to normal RR intervals (SDNN) on baseline 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) and subsequent appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) interventions in 70 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) in whom ICDs were implanted prophylactically in the presence of a low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). During 43 +/- 26 months of follow-up, 26 of 70 (37%) study patients with IDC received one or more appropriate ICD interventions for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) documented by electrograms stored in the ICD. Mean SDNN at ICD implant was 94 +/- 33 ms. No difference was found between patients with (90 +/- 25 ms) versus without (96 +/- 37 ms) appropriate ICD interventions for VT or VF during follow-up. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of baseline clinical characteristics including age, gender, LVEF, NYHA functional class, nonsustained VT on Holter, history of syncope, left bundle branch block, baseline medication and HRV revealed LVEF as the only significant predictor of arrhythmia. These findings do not support the use of HRV measured as SDNN on 24-hour ambulatory ECG to select patients with IDC for prophylactic ICD therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grimm et al. (2003) conducted a cohort in Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) (n=70). Heart rate variability (HRV) measured as SDNN was evaluated on Appropriate ICD interventions for sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Baseline heart rate variability did not predict appropriate ICD interventions in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (mean SDNN 90 ms in patients with events vs 96 ms in those without).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: