Key result
High ACEF score linked to ~2.6-fold higher 30-day major bleeding in STEMI treated with tirofiban.
Why the study?
The usefulness of the ACEF score for predicting bleeding events and clinical outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI with bail-out tirofiban therapy was unclear.
Observational (n=2,543)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May flag higher bleeding risk with bail-out tirofiban in STEMI PCI; leaves open added value for risk stratification pending prospective validation.
Introduction: In patients who have undergone interventional cardiac procedures, the risk of bleeding is higher than in patients who received conservative treatment due to multiple medications and comorbidities.Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the age, creatinine and ejection fraction (ACEF) score for predicting bleeding events and to compare short-and long-term clinical outcomes according to the ACEF score in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with bail-out tirofiban therapy (BOTT).Material and methods: A total of 2,543 patients were included and divided into three groups according to the following ACEF score tertiles: T1 (ACEF low ≤ 1.033), T2 (1.033 < ACEF mid ≤ 1.371), and T3 (ACEF high > 1.371).The main outcomes measured were the incidence rates of relevant bleeding events and mortality within 30 days and 3 years after the procedure.Results: A total of 73 (2.9%) patients had Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding events of grades 3, 4 or 5 and 104 (4%) patients died in a 30-day period.The ACEF score was effective at predicting 30-day bleeding (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): 0.658, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.579-0.737;p < 0.001), 30-day mortality (AUC = 0.701, 95% CI: 0.649-0.753;p < 0.001) and 3-year mortality (AUC = 0.778, 95% CI: 0.748-0.807;p < 0.001) events.Considering the ACEF score tertiles, T3 patients presented greater 30-day bleeding (1.6%, 2.8% and 4.1%; odds ratio (OR) = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.37-4.80),30-day mortality (1.7%, 3.5% and 7.1%; OR = 4.53, 95% CI: 2.51-8.18)and 3-year mortality (6.4%, 11% and 19.8%; hazard ratio = 3.56, 95% CI: 2.58-4.91)risks. Conclusions:The ACEF score is a user-friendly tool with excellent predictive value for bleeding events and mortality in patients undergoing pPCI with BOTT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ösken et al. (2021) conducted an observational in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=2,543). High ACEF score (Tertile 3: > 1.371) vs. Low ACEF score (Tertile 1: ≤ 1.033) was evaluated on 30-day Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) grades 3, 4, or 5 bleeding events (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.37-4.80). A high ACEF score was associated with increased 30-day major bleeding compared to a low score in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI with bail-out tirofiban therapy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: