Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study evaluates pressure calculation methods for pressure evaluation on wall boundaries in Moving Particle Semi-implicit (MPS) Fluid-Structure Interaction analysis. Particle and polygon wall models are compared using various interpolation and averaging techniques across jet impingement, hydrostatic, and dam-break scenarios. Findings indicate that both wall models yield similar accuracy, with simple averaging preferred for accuracy and simplicity. While polygon walls reduce computation time by over 50% in complex geometries, they may oscillate or underestimate pressure at corners. Conversely, particle walls provide superior stability in unsteady problems despite higher computational costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamiya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: