The flipped classroom (FC) model has obtained collective attention in medical education for its potential to enhance student engagement, active learning, and knowledge retention.This study systematically reviews the report on flipped classrooms in medical education using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) framework. Articles were retrieved from reputable databases, including PubMed, Medline, OVID, ACM, ScienceDirect, Taylor & Francis, MDPI, SAGE, SpringerLink, Wiley, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar.The 34 studies were identified exploring flipped classroom teaching approaches to enhance medical education. Review focuses on the tools and technologies employed such as video creation, learning management systems, podcasts, online assessments, and collaborative platforms as well as pedagogical strategies implemented across medical courses.This study focused on flipped learning in higher education. Future research should examine its application in other educational settings, including schools, vocational, technical, and professional training. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and augmented reality warrant investigation for their impact on student engagement and learning outcomes across disciplines. Further studies should also explore the influence of cultural and geographical factors on flipped classroom implementation and effectiveness. Additionally, research is needed to determine how flipped classroom activities can be tailored to specific learning objectives, student needs, and subject areas. Finally, longitudinal studies are recommended to assess the long- term effects of flipped learning on student achievement, retention, and academic success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karkera et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: