Why the study?
Permanent pacemaker implantation rates remain elevated after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation, making detailed assessment of the membranous septum anatomy essential to understand mechanisms and mitigate risk.
Does a 3D hologram system (CarnaLife Holo) accurately and reproducibly measure aortic valvar complex anatomy and membranous septum area compared to 3mensio Structural Heart in patients with aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, and coronary artery disease?
Observational
Does a 3D hologram system (CarnaLife Holo) accurately and reproducibly measure aortic valvar complex anatomy and membranous septum area compared to 3mensio Structural Heart in patients with aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, and coronary artery disease?
Effect estimate: ICC >0.99
p-value: p=0.906
3D holographic software provides a feasible, accurate, and reproducible tool for visualizing and measuring aortic valvar complex anatomy and membranous septum area prior to TAVI.
3D holography may enable precise membranous septum assessment in TAVI; leaves open whether it reduces pacemaker implantation.
Introduction Permanent pacemaker implantation rates remained elevated for patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation. Therefore, detailed assessment of the membranous septum anatomy is essential to understand mechanism and mitigate risk. This study aims to examine the accuracy and reproducibility of a novel 3D hologram system to measure transcatheter aortic valve implantation related aortic valvar complex anatomy and present a novel methodology to measure membranous septum area with it. Methods Cardiac computer tomography series of aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation and coronary artery disease patient cohorts were analysed using CarnaLife Holo (MedApp SA, Kraków, Poland) so as to quantify and compare their membranous septum areas. 3mensio Structural Heart was used as a benchmark comparator, with annulus area selected as the quantitative parameter. Results Intraclass correlation coefficient values between the software all exceeded 0.99, with no statistically significant difference noted between annulus area measurements. Bland-Altman plotting illustrated narrow boundaries of agreement, with no significant outliers. In interobserver agreement analysis for 3D hologram, annulus area measurements were not significantly different between two investigators (p=0.906). No significant difference was found between the membranous septum areas between the three cohorts after ANOVA testing (p=0.1640). Conclusion 3D holographic software provides feasible and reproducible tool for visualising and measuring the aortic valvar complex anatomy. In addition, its ability to assess the shape, pattern and area of the membranous septum offers anatomic insights not readily available with other software.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Sullivan et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, and coronary artery disease. CarnaLife Holo 3D hologram system vs. 3mensio Structural Heart was evaluated on Annulus area measurement agreement and membranous septum area quantification (ICC >0.99, p=0.906).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: