The content of microbial biomass (MB) was determined in samples of gray forest, chestnut, and tundra soils with different physicochemical properties (0.4-22.7% Corg; 8.4-26.8% silt particles; pH 4.3-8.4) by the methods of substrate-induced respiration (MB(SIR)) and direct microscopy (MB(M)). The samples of two upper soil layers, 0-5 and 5-10 cm (without plant litter), from different ecosystems (forest, forest shelter belt, meadow, fallow, and arable land) and elements of relief of interfluvial tundra (block/upper land plateau, depression between blocks) have been analyzed. The content of microbial biomass in the 0-5-cm soil layer was 216-8134 and 348-7513 microg C/g soil as measured by the methods of substrate-induced respiration and direct microscopy, respectively. The MB(SIR) and MB(M) values closely correlated with each other: r = 0.90 and 0.74 for 0-5 and 5-10 cm, respectively. The average MB(SIR)/MB(M) ratio was 90 and 60% for 0-5 and 5-10 cm, respectively. The portion of microbial carbon in total organic soil carbon was, on average, 4 and 3% (SIR) and 5 and 7% (direct microscopy) for 0-5 and 5-10 cm, respectively. Possible reasons for the differences between MB(SIR) and MB(M) values in the soils under study are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ananyeva et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: