Key result
Cancer comorbidity in younger AMI patients linked to ~3-fold higher in-hospital mortality despite lower PCI use.
Why the study?
Patients with AMI and concomitant cancer experience excess in-hospital mortality, but whether this excess risk is consistent across age groups and aligned with invasive management strategies remained unclear.
Does concomitant cancer comorbidity affect in-hospital mortality and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) use differently across age groups in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=356,024)
Yes
Does concomitant cancer comorbidity affect in-hospital mortality and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) use differently across age groups in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction?
Patients with acute myocardial infarction and concomitant cancer exhibit an age-dependent risk-treatment mismatch, where younger patients (<65 years) face a nearly threefold higher relative risk of in-hospital mortality despite consistently lower utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention across all age groups.
Younger AMI patients with cancer may warrant closer monitoring; leaves open whether PCI optimization improves survival in this subgroup.
Introduction Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and concomitant cancer experience excess in-hospital mortality. Whether this excess risk is consistent across age groups and aligned with invasive management strategies remains unclear. Purpose To assess age-specific associations between cancer comorbidity and in-hospital mortality and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) use in patients hospitalised with AMI. Methods This nationwide study used Swiss hospital discharge data (1998–2022). AMI admissions were identified using ICD-10 codes. Cancer comorbidity was defined by malignant neoplasm codes excluding non-melanoma skin cancer. Associations with in-hospital mortality and PCI were estimated using multivariable Poisson regression with robust variance. Age-stratified risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived from fully adjusted models, and the interaction between cancer and age group was tested. Results Among 356,024 AMI admissions, 7,334 (2.1%) involved cancer comorbidity. In patients <65 years, cancer was associated with a nearly threefold higher in-hospital mortality compared with patients without cancer (RR 2.97, 95% CI 2.37–3.71). This excess mortality attenuated progressively with age and was no longer evident in patients ≥85 years (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.90–1.12; P for interaction <0.001). In contrast, PCI use was consistently lower among cancer patients across all age groups, with the strongest relative reduction observed in those aged 75–84 years (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.70–0.79; P for interaction <0.001). Conclusions Cancer comorbidity is associated with a pronounced age-dependent risk–treatment mismatch after AMI. Younger patients with cancer face the highest relative mortality risk despite lower PCI use, whereas the relative excess risk attenuates in the very elderly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yi et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=356,024). Cancer comorbidity (malignant neoplasm excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) vs. Patients hospitalized with AMI without cancer comorbidity was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (in patients <65 years) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) use (RR 2.97, 95% CI 2.37-3.71, p=<0.001 for interaction). Cancer comorbidity in AMI patients <65 years nearly tripled in-hospital mortality (RR 2.97; 95% CI 2.37-3.71) while PCI use remained lower across all ages (P<0.001 for interaction).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: