Key result
Intravenous immunoglobulin fails to reduce 1-year carditis rates vs placebo in acute rheumatic fever.
Why the study?
No therapeutic agent had been shown to alter the clinical outcome of acute rheumatic fever (ARF). This study investigated whether intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), an immunomodulator, modifies the natural history of ARF by reducing the extent and severity of carditis.
RCT (n=59)
Double-blind
Stratified by presence and severity of carditis
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Intravenous immunoglobulin does not reduce carditis in acute rheumatic fever; challenges extension of its immunomodulatory benefit from other autoimmune cardiac diseases.
BACKGROUND: Acute rheumatic fever (ARF) remains the leading cause of acquired heart disease in children worldwide. No therapeutic agent has been shown to alter the clinical outcome of the acute illness. Immunological mechanisms appear to be involved in the pathogenesis of ARF. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), a proven immunomodulator, may benefit cardiac conditions of an autoimmune nature. We investigated whether IVIG modified the natural history of ARF by reducing the extent and severity of carditis. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluated IVIG in patients with a first episode of rheumatic fever, stratifying patients by the presence and severity of carditis before randomization. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 1 g/kg IVIG on days 1 and 2 and 0.4 g/kg on days 14 and 28, or they received a placebo infusion. Clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic evaluation was performed at 0, 2, 4, 6, 26, and 52 weeks. Fifty-nine patients were treated, of whom 39 had carditis (including 4 subclinical) and/or migratory polyarthritis (n=39). There was no difference between groups in the rate of normalization of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate or acute-phase proteins at the 6-week follow-up. On echocardiography, 59% in the IVIG group and 69% in the placebo group had carditis at baseline. There was no significant difference in the cardiac outcome, including the proportion of valves involved, or in the severity of valvar regurgitation at 1 year. At 1 year, 41% of the IVIG and 50% of the placebo group had carditis. CONCLUSIONS: IVIG did not alter the natural history of ARF, with no detectable difference in the clinical, laboratory, or echocardiographic parameters of the disease process during the subsequent 12 months.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
VOSS et al. (2001) conducted an RCT in Acute rheumatic fever (n=59). Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) vs. Placebo infusion was evaluated on Carditis at 1 year. Intravenous immunoglobulin did not reduce 1-year carditis rates compared with placebo in patients with acute rheumatic fever.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: