Key result
Post-infarction VT ablation carries a ~34% recurrence rate, associated with larger electroanatomic scar area.
Why the study?
The factors that predict recurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) after catheter ablation in patients with prior infarctions were not well described.
Cohort (n=98)
After catheter ablation for post-infarction VT, recurrence occurs in about one-third of patients—predominantly as new VTs originating near prior ablation lesions—and is significantly associated with a larger myocardial scar area.
Larger scar area was associated with VT recurrence; leaves open whether scar-targeted ablation improves outcomes, requiring prospective validation.
Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess the determinants of ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence in patients who underwent VT ablation for post-infarction VT. Background The factors that predict recurrence of VT after catheter ablation in patients with prior infarctions are not well described. Methods Catheter ablation was performed in 98 consecutive patients (88 males [90%]; mean age 67 ± 10 years; ejection fraction 27 ± 13%) with post-infarction VT. Electrograms from the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator were analyzed, and VTs were classified as clinical, nonclinical, or new clinical. Results A total of 725 VTs were induced during the ablation procedure. All VTs were targeted. In 76 patients, 105 clinical VTs were inducible. Critical sites were identified with entrainment mapping and pace-mapping (≥10 of 12 matching leads) for 75 of 105 clinical VTs (71%) and for 278 of 620 nonclinical VTs (45%). Post-ablation, the clinical VT was not inducible in any patient, and all VTs were rendered noninducible in 63% of the patients. Over a mean follow-up period of 35 ± 23 months, 65 of 98 patients (66%) had no recurrent VTs and 33 (34%) had VT recurrence. A new VT occurred in 26 of 33 patients (79%), and a prior clinical VT recurred in 7 patients (21%). Patients with recurrent VT had a larger scar area as assessed by electroanatomic mapping compared with patients without recurrent VTs (93 ± 40 cm(2) vs. 69 ± 30 cm(2); p = 0.002). In patients with repeat procedures, the majority of inducible VTs for which a critical area could be identified were at a distance of 6 ± 3 mm to the prior ablation lesions. Conclusions Patients with recurrent VTs have a larger scar as assessed by electroanatomic mapping. Most recurrent VTs were new, and the majority of these VTs were mapped to the vicinity of prior ablation lesions in patients with repeat procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yokokawa et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Post-infarction ventricular tachycardia (n=98). Catheter ablation for post-infarction ventricular tachycardia vs. Patients without recurrent VT vs. patients with recurrent VT was evaluated on Ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence and electroanatomic scar area (p=0.002). Catheter ablation of post-infarction VT resulted in a 34% recurrence rate (79% new VT), associated with larger scar area (93 vs. 69 cm2; p=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: