Key result
Poor cardiovascular health linked to ~2.7-fold higher prevalence of high atherogenic index of plasma.
Why the study?
The association between American Heart Association-defined ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics and the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), a marker for atherosclerosis, needed to be determined in a rural population.
Cross-Sectional (n=11,113)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May prompt AIP assessment in poor CV health; leaves open causality and practice change pending longitudinal data.
In 2010, the American Heart Association has proposed a new concept "ideal cardiovascular health" (CVH) based on seven CVH metrics: smoking, body mass index, physical activity, diet score, total cholesterol, blood pressure, and fasting plasma glucose. We aimed to determine the association of CVH with atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), a strong marker for atherosclerosis (AS). This cross-sectional study was conducted in the rural areas of northeast China and 11,113 middle-aged subjects were enrolled. Seven CVH metrics were classified into ideal, intermediate, and poor groups. AIP was calculated as log (TG/HDL) (triglycerides/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol). AIP > 0.21 was classified into the high AIP group and served as dependent variable. All seven CVH metrics were correlated with AIP. A gradient relationship between the number of poor CVH metrics and the prevalence of high AIP existed. Log binomial regression analysis showed that compared to those with five to seven ideal CVH metrics, individuals with four, three, two, one, and no ideal CVH metrics had 1.67, 2.66, 4.00, 5.30 and 6.50 times higher prevalence for high AIP. The subjects with poor CVH status had 2.73 times higher prevalence for high AIP. We found an inversely gradient relationship between the number of ideal CVH metrics and lower prevalence of high AIP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular health and subclinical atherosclerosis risk (n=11,113). Poor cardiovascular health (CVH) status vs. Ideal and intermediate cardiovascular health (CVH) status was evaluated on High atherogenic index of plasma (AIP > 0.21) (PR 2.73, 95% CI 2.25, 3.31). Poor cardiovascular health status was associated with a 2.73-fold higher prevalence of high atherogenic index of plasma (PR 2.73, 95% CI 2.25-3.31) compared to ideal or intermediate status.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: