Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The grid integration of photovoltaic battery storage systems under weak-grid conditions exhibits reduced stability, and abrupt switching between grid-following and grid-forming control causes modulation discontinuities. This paper investigates an adaptive grid-following/grid-forming fusion control method for a 500 kVA photovoltaic battery storage case. A bounded piecewise-linear map schedules a grid-forming weight reference from a short-circuit ratio input, and a first-order low-pass filter limits the weight change rate. An online SCR identification framework is formulated for grid strength scheduling. In the reported reduced-order study, the controller behavior is validated using prescribed SCR trajectories, while the identification procedure is discussed as an implementable scheduling mechanism. A low-order phase margin model selects boundaries of short-circuit ratio low = 1.5, short-circuit ratio high = 7, and Tα = 0.5 s. Four event response cases—a short-circuit ratio step, identification noise, voltage sag, and photovoltaic fluctuation—compare adaptive fusion control with pure grid-following, pure grid-forming, and fixed-threshold switching. A check evaluates scheduled-weight sensitivity to the short-circuit ratio input error. In the weak-grid case, adaptive fusion control reduces point-of-common-coupling voltage oscillation by about 70% relative to pure grid-following and reduces the peak current impulse versus fixed-threshold switching. Under a ±10% short-circuit ratio error, the scheduled weight changes by at most 0.055.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: