Key result
Higher HFpEF-ABA score linked to ~1% higher all-cause mortality per point in acute HF.
Why the study?
Does the HFpEF-ABA score predict long-term all-cause mortality across all heart failure categories in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure?
Cohort (n=3,974)
Does the HFpEF-ABA score predict long-term all-cause mortality across all heart failure categories in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure?
The simple clinical HFpEF-ABA score, originally designed to screen for HFpEF, independently predicts long-term all-cause mortality across all ejection fraction categories in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
HFpEF-ABA score may aid mortality risk stratification in AHF; leaves open incremental value and prospective validation.
HFpEF-ABA score, based on age, body mass index, and history of atrial fibrillation, was initially developed as a diagnostic screening tool for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study evaluated the prognostic significance of HFpEF-ABA score for all-cause mortality across HF phenotypes in patients hospitalized for acute HF (AHF). We analyzed 3,974 admitted patients in the STRATS-AHF registry (Korea, 2009-2016), classified into HFrEF (LVEF ≤40%; n=2,094), HFmrEF (LVEF 41-49%; n=609), and HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%; n=1,271). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Over a median follow-up of 51.4 months, 1,642 patients (41.3%) died. HFpEF-ABA score was significantly higher in nonsurvivors than survivors (61.0±23.2 vs. 54.6±25.9; P<0.001), with a univariate hazard ratio (HR) of 1.009 per point (95% CI: 1.007-1.011; P<0.001). Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a monotonically increasing, non-linear association between the score and mortality risk, and patients with a score <45 had much better 6-year survival compared to those with a score ≥45 in the overall group and in each HF phenotype (all P≤0.005). Adding HFpEF-ABA score to clinical, pharmacological, and echocardiographic variables produced a modest but significant improvement in individual risk reclassification (net reclassification improvement 0.198; integrated discrimination improvement 0.013), despite only a marginal increase in discrimination (C-index from 0.696 to 0.700, P<0.001), with an independent HR of 1.008 per point (95% CI: 1.005-1.012; P<0.001) and preserved calibration. HFpEF-ABA score independently predicted long-term all-cause mortality across HF phenotypes in AHF patients, offering modest incremental prognostic value beyond established clinical, echocardiographic, and therapeutic predictors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute heart failure across all ejection fraction categories (HFrEF, HFmrEF, HFpEF) (n=3,974). HFpEF-ABA score (based on age, body mass index, and history of atrial fibrillation) vs. Lower HFpEF-ABA score (e.g., <45 vs ≥45) or established clinical, pharmacological, and echocardiographic predictors alone was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.008 per point, 95% CI 1.005-1.012, p=<0.001). The HFpEF-ABA score independently predicted long-term all-cause mortality across acute heart failure phenotypes (adjusted HR 1.008 per point; 95% CI 1.005-1.012; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: