Key result
Elevated post-PCI LVEDP is linked to ~5-fold higher odds of poor myocardial perfusion in STEMI.
Why the study?
The impact of postprocedural LVEDP on microvascular reperfusion indices and ventricular function following primary PCI in patients with acute STEMI needed to be determined.
Does elevated postprocedural left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (>19 mmHg) predict impaired microvascular perfusion, incomplete ST-segment resolution, and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction at 1 month in patients with first STEMI achieving TIMI-3 flow after primary PCI?
Cohort (n=250)
Blinded outcome assessment
No
Does elevated postprocedural left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (>19 mmHg) predict impaired microvascular perfusion, incomplete ST-segment resolution, and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction at 1 month in patients with first STEMI achieving TIMI-3 flow after primary PCI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Routine intra-procedural measurement of LVEDP after successful primary PCI in STEMI patients provides an inexpensive, immediate hemodynamic marker to identify those at high risk for microvascular dysfunction and reduced 1-month left ventricular ejection fraction despite achieving TIMI-3 flow.
Objectives: To determine the impact of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) on microvascular reperfusion indices and ventricular function following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methodology: This prospective cohort study included 250 consecutive STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI with successful restoration of TIMI-3 epicardial flow. Postprocedural LVEDP was measured and patients were categorized into two groups: high LVEDP (>19 mmHg) and low LVEDP (≤19 mmHg). Study outcomes included TIMI myocardial perfusion (TMP) grade, ST-segment resolution (>50%), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at one-month follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associations while adjusting for age, sex, infarct location, and time to PCI. Results: The mean age was 54.8 ± 11.8 years, and 83% were male. Elevated LVEDP independently predicted poorer TMP grade (aOR 1.22; 95% CI 1.13–1.32; p < 0.001), incomplete ST-segment resolution (aOR 1.11; 95% CI 1.05–1.18; p = 0.001), and reduced LVEF (<40%) (aOR 1.21; 95% CI 1.11–1.32; p < 0.001). Older age and anterior wall infarction were additional predictors of reduced systolic recovery. Conclusion: Elevated LVEDP independently predicts impaired myocardial reperfusion, incomplete electrical recovery, and reduced left ventricular systolic function after primary PCI in STEMI patients. Routine intra-procedural LVEDP measurement may help identify patients at risk for microvascular dysfunction and guide targeted post-PCI management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malik et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=250). Elevated postprocedural left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP >19 mmHg) vs. Low postprocedural LVEDP (≤19 mmHg) was evaluated on Poor TIMI Myocardial Perfusion grade (TMP <3) (OR 4.98, 95% CI 2.91-8.54, p=<0.001). Elevated postprocedural LVEDP (>19 mmHg) increased the odds of poor myocardial perfusion (TMP grade <3) after primary PCI in STEMI patients (72.4% vs 34.5%; OR 4.98, 95% CI 2.91-8.54, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: