Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The rapid advancement of technology and evolving labor market demands challenge traditional Technical-Vocational Education and Training (TVET) systems to remain relevant and responsive. Micro-credentials and technology-driven learning modalities offer flexible, modular pathways for upskilling and reskilling, yet their integration in Philippine TVET remains limited. This study employed a mixed-methods research design to examine the adoption of micro-credentials and digital learning approaches within selected TVET institutions in the Third District of Cebu Province. Quantitative data were gathered through structured questionnaires administered to administrators, educators, and industry partners (N=70), while qualitative insights were obtained through interviews and document reviews. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and thematic analysis were utilized to interpret the data. Findings reveal moderate curriculum flexibility and partial alignment with industry needs. Micro-credentials were perceived as feasible and beneficial for targeted skill acquisition, yet effective implementation is hindered by insufficient institutional support, limited resources, and inconsistent faculty readiness. Technology-driven learning modalities—such as blended learning, digital tools, and mobile platforms—were recognized as effective in enhancing technical and 21st-century skills, although uneven access and varying digital competencies among educators remain challenges. Significant correlations indicate that curriculum gaps strongly influence both technology integration and modernization barriers. The study underscores the need for a strengthened, industry-responsive TVET framework that integrates micro-credentials and technology-driven skills development. Improved digital infrastructure, faculty capacity-building, and stronger industry partnerships are essential to modernizing TVET and preparing learners for emerging industry demands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arcadio et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: