Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
GenAI’s rapid proliferation has reshaped EFL academic writing, yet research remains fragmented. This review synthesizes 24 publications (2022–2026) on learning outcomes, self-regulated learning (SRL), and ethical governance. Three findings emerge: (1) positive effects on surface-level writing are confirmed but moderated by intervention duration, task complexity, learner proficiency, and evaluation methods; (2) GenAI’s impact on SRL depends on its role as a scaffold versus a substitute for learner agency, as illuminated by TAM, SCT, and SRL; (3) ethical governance is shifting from plagiarism policing to proactive AI literacy. Gaps persist in longitudinal and process-oriented designs, representation of underserved groups, and theory-driven pedagogy. The review argues that GenAI’s value cannot be judged by writing products alone but requires understanding the interplay among cognition, autonomy, and regulation. An ecologically-informed research agenda is proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohan Li (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: