Comparative analysis reveals blended learning enhances engagement in diverse contexts, while fully online learning provides scalable access.
This paper examines the comparative dynamics of blended learning and fully online learning in higher education, with a specific focus on the Indian context and global parallels. Blended learning combines face-to-face interaction with digital tools, enabling a balance between personal engagement and flexible access, while fully online learning offers scalability and inclusivity, transcending geographical limitations. The study critically analyses their respective pedagogical, infrastructural, and learner engagement dimensions, identifying contexts in which each approach proves most effective. In India, blended learning’s adaptability aligns well with diverse linguistic, cultural, and infrastructural realities, whereas fully online learning demands robust connectivity, high digital literacy, and learner self-motivation. The findings underscore that neither modality is universally superior; rather, their strategic integration can maximise educational outcomes. The paper concludes that technology’s role in higher education must be guided by pedagogical intent, equitable access, and sustained capacity building, ensuring that innovations serve both quality and inclusivity in the evolving educational landscape.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shambharkar et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: