Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative case study reveals how Muhammadiyah education balances charitable roles and neoliberalism, suggesting new dynamics in school prestige.
This article critically investigates the dual roles of charitable businesses in Muhammadiyah education in Yogyakarta, which reproduce sociocultural, capital, and prestige distinctions among high schools. Beyond prior works focusing on internal dynamics, this study revives the class-based approach to analyze how Muhammadiyah’s education system simultaneously resists and internalizes capitalism’s principles to reconstruct a new field with its logic. Using a qualitative case study with in-depth interviews, we confirm that reproduction models enabling disparity among Muhammadiyah schools are deliberately conducted to sustain philanthropy movements, Al-Maun’s spirit, and program independence amid neoliberal education shifts. The results show that historical context, regulation, and collaborative negotiation legitimize stratified institution quality in which elite schools adopt economic schemes to subsidize non-privileged schools. This dialectic institutionalizes a habitus that rationalizes Muhammadiyah schools’ prestige as socially acceptable. Although causing dominant class concentration, this model becomes a strategy to maintain sovereignty from state/market domination while expanding modern Islamic schools across Indonesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jatmiko et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: