Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to investigate the significance of emotional intelligence (EI) in relation to leadership efficacy and organizational conduct. Specifically, the study aims to explore the constituent elements of emotional intelligence, their influence on leadership behavior, and their correlation with organizational behavior. Additionally, the study seeks to examine the impact of emotional intelligence on fostering a favorable organizational climate, improving communication, facilitating decision-making, resolving conflicts, and promoting employee engagement. Methods: This study employs a quantitative research methodology, utilizing a self-administered survey instrument. The sample consists of 60 participants holding managerial positions in various organizations. Statistical methodologies such as explanatory diagrams and correlation analysis are used to analyze the data and investigate the relationships between emotional intelligence, managerial competence, organizational behavior, and employee satisfaction. Results: The results of the study highlight a positive association between emotional intelligence and managerial competence, organizational behavior, and employee satisfaction. The findings suggest that higher levels of emotional intelligence are correlated with more effective leadership, improved organizational climate, better communication, enhanced decision-making, conflict resolution, and higher levels of employee engagement. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study emphasizes the importance of emotional intelligence in leadership effectiveness and organizational behavior. The findings underscore the positive impact of emotional intelligence on various aspects of organizational conduct and employee satisfaction. Additionally, the study suggests avenues for future research, including longitudinal inquiries, intercultural variances, exploring intervening and moderating factors, developing interventions, and conducting comparative assessments.
Kour et al. (Thu,) studied this question.