Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A multilayer perceptron model predicts malignant transformation in oral leukoplakia, highlighting histopathological features and S-phase involvement.
Background Oral leukoplakia (OL) is a potentially malignant disorder of the oral mucosa. Accurate prediction of malignant transformation (MT) remains a clinical challenge. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a machine learning model that integrates histopathological, demographic, and DNA content features to predict MT risk in OL. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 97 OL cases—18 with confirmed MT and 79 non‐transformed controls—selected from a larger series. Each case included clinicopathological features, and DNA content data obtained by flow cytometry for cell cycle phases (G1, S‐phase, G2 and excess DNA beyond the tetraploid region [4cER]). All cases had a minimum 5‐year follow‐up or histologically confirmed transformation. A multilayer perceptron (MLP) model was trained on 27 features. Stratified five‐fold cross‐validation and minority class oversampling (positive filling) were used to improve learning and mitigate data imbalance. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1‐score, AUC, and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Results Significant predictors of MT included 4cER ( p = 0.005), G2 phase ( p = 0.04), dysplasia grading ( p = 0.003), and inflammatory infiltrate ( p = 0.01). The optimized model yielded 72% sensitivity, 96% specificity, and an AUC of 85.4%. Survival analysis showed significantly poorer outcomes in the high‐risk cases predicted by the model ( p < 0.0001). Conclusion Integrating DNA content analysis with machine learning provides an objective and clinically useful model to stratify malignant risk in OL, complementing conventional histopathology and supporting personalized patient management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pontes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: