Key result
Persistent fragmented QRS after CRT-D links to ~361% higher arrhythmic risk in ischemic heart disease.
Why the study?
The prognostic role of fragmented QRS in CRT-D according to the aetiology of underlying heart disease remains unknown.
Does the persistence of fragmented QRS after CRT-D implantation predict arrhythmic events in patients with HFrEF?
Cohort (n=176)
Does the persistence of fragmented QRS after CRT-D implantation predict arrhythmic events in patients with HFrEF?
The persistence of fragmented QRS after CRT-D implantation is a strong predictor of arrhythmic events specifically in patients with ischemic heart disease.
May flag higher arrhythmic risk in IHD post-CRT-D; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding practice.
Introduction Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) reduces the risk of sudden death in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), with a greater benefit in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD). Fragmented QRS (fQRS) is associated with a worse prognosis in various heart diseases, but its role in CRT-D concerning the aetiology of the underlying disease remains unknown. Objective To assess the prognostic value of fQRS and its variations before and after CRT-D in terms of arrhythmic events (AEs) according to the aetiology of the heart disease. Methods Patients who underwent CRT-D (2009–2022) were included and categorized based on the presence of IHD or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (nIHD). fQRS before and after CRT-D was defined as different RSR' patterns: additional R waves (R′) and notches in R and S waves in two contiguous leads. Four categories were established based on the presence of fQRS or non-fragmented QRS (nfQRS) before and after implantation. The primary outcome was AE, defined as appropriate defibrillator therapy (anti-tachycardia pacing or appropriate shock) for a ventricular arrhythmia (VA) or as untreated sustained VA. Results A total of 176 patients were included (100 with IHD). Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median follow-up was 37 months, with 29 documented AEs (15 in IHD patients, 14 in nIHD patients, p=0.545). Multivariate Cox regression, stratified by heart disease type, showed that the presence of fQRS before and after implantation was associated with AEs in IHD patients (HR 4.61; 95% CI 1.02–20.80). The disappearance or development of fQRS after CRT-D, as well as fQRS in nIHD, was not associated with a worse prognosis (Table 2). Conclusions IHD patients who maintain fQRS after CRT-D have a higher risk of AEs, whereas those with pre-implant nfQRS or resolution of fQRS after CRT-D do not present a worse prognosis.Table 1.Baseline characteristics Table 2.Cox regression
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Capilla et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=176). Persistence of fragmented QRS (fQRS) before and after CRT-D vs. Non-fragmented QRS (nfQRS) or resolution of fQRS was evaluated on Arrhythmic events (appropriate defibrillator therapy for a ventricular arrhythmia or untreated sustained VA) (HR 4.61, 95% CI 1.02-20.80). In patients with ischemic heart disease, the persistence of fragmented QRS after CRT-D implantation was associated with a higher risk of arrhythmic events (HR 4.61; 95% CI 1.02-20.80).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: