Why the study?
Does the change in fragmented QRS (fQRS) correlate with therapeutic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Does the change in fragmented QRS (fQRS) correlate with therapeutic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Regression of fragmented QRS complex is a highly specific marker for identifying positive therapeutic response and electrical reverse remodeling following cardiac resynchronization therapy.
BACKGROUND: Fragmented QRS (fQRS) marks inhomogeneous activation and asynchronous cardiac contraction. It has been proved that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) could reverse geometrical remodeling as well as correct electrical dyssynchrony. We aimed to investigate whether fQRS changed corresponding to the therapeutic response to CRT. METHODS: Patients who underwent de novo CRT implantation previously and had ≥1 follow-up between August 2012 and September 2013 in our hospital were investigated. Intrinsic electrocardiogram was recorded and fQRS in any lead was calculated. Response to CRT was defined as absolute improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction by ≥10% or by improvement >1 New York Heart Association class and without heart failure hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients (48 male, mean ages, 61 ± 9 years) were included in this study. At a median follow-up of 13 months, 57 patients had response to CRT. Responders had narrowed QRS (from 167 ± 23 ms to 158 ± 19 ms, P = 0.003) and reduced fQRS post-CRT. Nonresponders had QRS prolonging (from 151 ± 26 ms to 168 ± 16 ms, P = 0.033) and increase in fQRS. Eleven of 12 patients with reduced fQRS were responders and 8 of 12 with increased fQRS were nonresponders. Both changes in QRS and fQRS correlated strongly with CRT response (r = 0.389, P = 0.001 and r = 0.403, P = 0.000, respectively). Reduction of fQRS in ≥1 leads had high specificity (95%) in association to responders, though in low sensitivity (19%). CONCLUSIONS: The changes in fQRS associated with therapeutic response to CRT. Regression of fQRS could be a maker of electrical reverse remodeling following CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: