Key result
TECAR therapy triggers inappropriate ICD shocks via electromagnetic interference misidentified as ventricular fibrillation.
Why the study?
Data regarding the safety of capacitive-resistive electric transfer (TECAR) therapy in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices are limited.
Does TECAR therapy cause clinically relevant electromagnetic interference and inappropriate shocks in patients with ICDs?
Case Report (n=1)
No
Does TECAR therapy cause clinically relevant electromagnetic interference and inappropriate shocks in patients with ICDs?
TECAR therapy can generate critical electromagnetic interference leading to inappropriate ICD shocks, demonstrating that it should be strictly avoided in ICD carriers.
Alerts clinicians to TECAR-ICD interactions; first case report leaves open systematic safety evaluation in CIED patients.
Background Capacitive–resistive electric transfer (TECAR) therapy is a form of endogenous diathermy delivering radiofrequency current and is increasingly used for musculoskeletal rehabilitation. However, data regarding its safety in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are limited. Case summary A 54-year-old man with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) underwent lumbar TECAR therapy for muscular contracture. During the session, he experienced two inappropriate ICD shocks while remaining conscious and without clinical sequelae. Device interrogation revealed high-frequency, non-physiological signals simultaneously recorded on atrial and ventricular intracardiac electrograms, which were interpreted by the ICD as ventricular fibrillation and resulted in shock delivery. Discussion This report represents the first documented case demonstrating electrogram evidence of electromagnetic interference between TECAR therapy and an ICD. The findings highlight a relevant safety concern and suggest that TECAR therapy should be avoided in ICD carriers and, more broadly, used with extreme caution in patients with other CIEDs, only after careful risk–benefit assessment and discussion with an electrophysiology specialist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costantino et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy with an ICD (n=1). Capacitive-resistive electric transfer (TECAR) therapy was evaluated on Inappropriate ICD shocks due to electromagnetic interference. TECAR therapy induced significant electromagnetic interference that was interpreted by the ICD as ventricular fibrillation, triggering two inappropriate shocks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: