Key result
TTVR linked to ~76% reduction in heart failure hospitalizations versus baseline in high-risk severe TR.
Why the study?
Severe tricuspid regurgitation causes recurrent heart failure hospitalizations, but real-world data evaluating the impact of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement on heart failure hospitalizations are limited.
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement reduce heart failure hospitalization and improve clinical outcomes in high-risk patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Cohort (n=75)
Yes
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement reduce heart failure hospitalization and improve clinical outcomes in high-risk patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement significantly reduces heart failure hospitalizations and improves functional capacity and quality of life in high-risk patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation.
BACKGROUND: Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) causes high morbidity and recurrent heart failure hospitalizations (HFH). Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) consistently eliminates TR, but real-world data on HFH reduction are limited. We therefore evaluated the impact of TTVR on HFH and clinical outcomes in a diverse cohort of compassionate-use and trial patients. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter Canadian registry included 75 high-risk patients (STS score 8.2±5.9%) undergoing TTVR with the EVOQUE system. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH) within one year after TTVR. Secondary endpoints included the annualized HFH rate 12 months before vs after TTVR, symptoms, quality of life (KCCQ-Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire), and functional capacity. RESULTS: Procedural success was high (technical: 97.3%; device: 93.3%), with sustained TR reduction to ≤mild (94.3%), and a 6.7% one-year mortality. TTVR resulted in an 76.1% relative reduction in HFH (p<0.001). NYHA Class III/IV decreased from 76% to 10% (p<0.001). Significant improvements were observed in six-minute walk distance (260.8±104.7m to 334.5±103.5m, p<0.001) and KCCQ score (56.2±15.2 to 73.5±19.2 points, p=0.001). Multivariable analysis identified baseline NYHA IV (OR 3.96, p=0.003) and prior HFH (OR 2.31, p=0.033) as independent predictors of the composite endpoint (HFH/death). Comparative analysis showed that while compassionate-use patients (n=24) had a higher-risk profile than trial patients (n=51), both cohorts achieved comparable and significant clinical improvements. CONCLUSIONS: In a diverse, high-risk cohort, TTVR dramatically reduced HFH and significantly improved quality of life. These results reinforce the therapeutic benefits of TTVR in high-risk patients with severe TR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patrascu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (n=75). Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) with the EVOQUE system vs. Pre-procedure baseline was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH) within one year after TTVR. Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement yielded a 76.1% relative reduction in heart failure hospitalizations (p<0.001) and a 6.7% one-year mortality in high-risk patients with severe TR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: