Why the study?
What are the outcomes of ischemic stroke patients presenting within 3 hours who do not receive intravenous tPA because of mild or improving symptoms?
What are the outcomes of ischemic stroke patients presenting within 3 hours who do not receive intravenous tPA because of mild or improving symptoms?
A substantial minority of ischemic stroke patients deemed 'too good to treat' with tPA experience poor outcomes, suggesting a need to re-evaluate stroke severity criteria for tPA eligibility.
Patients with mild/improving symptoms may still face poor outcomes; leaves open whether tPA eligibility criteria merit prospective reevaluation.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Some patients with mild or improving ischemic stroke symptoms do not receive intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) because they look "too good to treat" (TGT); however, some have poor outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from a prospective single-center study between 2002 and 2004. TGT patients were those arriving within 3 hours of symptom onset and not treated with intravenous tPA solely because of mild or improving symptoms. RESULTS: Of 128 patients presenting within 3 hours, 41 (34%) were not given tPA because of mild or improving stroke. Of the TGT patients, 11 of 41 (27%) died or were not discharged home because of neurological worsening (n=6) or persistent "mild" neurological deficit (n=5). No single variable at presentation was associated with death or lack of home discharge. There were 10 of 41 TGT patients (24%) who had > or =4-point improvement in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score before tPA decision; these patients were more likely to have subsequent neurological worsening (relative risk, 4.1, 95% CI, 1.1 to 15.4; P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial minority of patients deemed too good for intravenous tPA were unable to be discharged home. A re-evaluation of the stroke severity criteria for tPA eligibility may be indicated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: