What question did this study set out to answer?

This study aims to evaluate the impact of delayed endovascular thrombectomy on clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients.

May 8, 2026European Stroke Journal

Abstract Number: Esoc2026a174 Impact of Delayed Endovascular Thrombectomy Beyond Eight Hours on Clinical Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Real-World Single-Center Study

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

This study aims to evaluate the impact of delayed endovascular thrombectomy on clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients.
Retrospective analysis of 352 acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT within 24 hours.
Outcomes classified using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) for functional outcomes.
Logistic regression used to identify predictors of poor outcomes.
56.4% of EVT recipients experienced poor outcomes (mRS 4-6).
Delayed EVT beyond eight hours associated with aOR 4.583 (p=0.002) for poor outcomes.
Independent predictors of poor outcomes included older age (aOR 1.032, p=0.010) and higher NIHSS scores (aOR 1.078, p=0.003).

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Retrospective study assesses effects of delayed endovascular thrombectomy on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke, indicating significant risks for poor prognosis.

Cite This Study

Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f0dbfa21ec5bbf0770c https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1232

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Retrospective study assesses effects of delayed endovascular thrombectomy on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke, indicating significant risks for poor prognosis.

Abstract Number: Esoc2026a174 Impact of Delayed Endovascular Thrombectomy Beyond Eight Hours on Clinical Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Real-World Single-Center Study

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Abstract Number: Esoc2026a174 Impact of Delayed Endovascular Thrombectomy Beyond Eight Hours on Clinical Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Real-World Single-Center Study

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider